THE
INCARNATION
"The
Logos Was Made Flesh and Dwelt Among Us"--John 1:14
The
common thought in respect to our Lord's manifestation in the
flesh is usually expressed in the word incarnation. This
usual thought we believe to be wholly incorrect, unscriptural.
The Incarnation theory is that our Lord's human body, which
was born of Mary, was merely a clothing, a covering for the
spiritual body. The thought therefore attached to our Lord's
earthly life, according to this theory, is that our Lord during
his earthly life was still a spirit being, exactly as before,
except that he used the flesh that was born of Mary, and that
was known as the man Christ Jesus, as his veil or medium of
communication with mankind, after the manner in which angels
had appeared in human form in previous times--to Abraham, to
Manoah, to Lot, and others. (Gen. 18:1,2; 19:1; Judges 13:9-11,16)
Because of this incorrect premise, many confused and unscriptural
ideas have been evolved respecting the various incidents of
our Lord's life and death: for instance, this theory assumes
that our Lord's weariness was not real, but feigned; because
he, as a spirit being, could know no weariness. The logic of
this theory would imply also that our Lord's prayers were feigned,
because, says this theory, he was God himself, and to pray would
have been to pray to himself; hence it is argued that his prayers
were merely pro forma, to make an impression upon the disciples
and those who were about. The same theory is bound to suppose
that our Lord's death was merely an appearance of death, for
they argue that Jesus was God the Father, who being from everlasting
to everlasting, cannot die: hence that the apparent agony and
cry, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"
and the dying, were merely pro forma, to make the impression
upon the minds of those who heard and saw. The logical argument
of this theory, therefore, is that there was no real death for
man's sins, but merely an appearance of one, a spectacular effect,
a dramatic show, a Cinematographic representation, a deception
produced for a good purpose--to favorably influence the sympathies
and sensibilities of mankind.
All
of this is wrong, and violently in opposition to the truth on
the subject, as presented in the Word of God. The Scriptural
declaration is not that our Lord assumed a body of flesh as
a covering for a spiritual body, as did the angels previously;
but that he actually laid aside, or, as the Greek renders it,
"divested himself of," his prehuman conditions, and
actually took our nature, or, as our text above declares, "the
Logos was made flesh." There was no fraud, no sham, about
it: it was not that he merely appeared to humble himself, while
really retaining his glory and power: it was not that he seemed
to become poor for our sakes, yet actually remained rich in
the possession of the higher spiritual nature all the time:
it was not that he merely put on the clothing, the appearance,
of a servant. No, but he actually became a man-- "the man
Christ Jesus, who gave himself a ransom for all." 1 Tim.
2:5
When
we come to consider particularly the ransom feature of his work,
that it was absolutely necessary that he should be a man--neither
more nor less than a perfect man--because it was a man that
sinned, man who was to be redeemed, and the divine law required
that a man's life should pay the redemption price for a man's
life. "As by a man came death, by a man also came the resurrection
of the dead." (1 Cor. 15:21) But let no one misunderstand
us by this to mean that our Redeemer became a man such as we
are, full of inherited imperfections and blemishes. Quite to
the contrary of this: the same word of God declares that he
was "holy, harmless, separate from sinners." Heb.
7:26,28; Luke 1:35